A Small group of Bible references account for over three-hundred of Shakespeare’s ~1500 allusions to the Bible. For one example, the graphic (Figure 1) illustrates seven allusions/echoes of Romans 7.20 in Shakespeare.
“Diagnostic” refers to the relevant methodology of the distinction between a “screening test” and a “test for specificity.” It’s been well established for over a century now that Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, passes the “screening test” for Shakespeare in multiple independent ways: known as the “best for comedy” in his own lifetime, a patron of players and poet who visited Italy, etc.
And, surprise, surprise, he owned a Geneva Bible – surviving today in the archives of the Folger Shakespeare Library – among other significant Shakespeare sources.
And, we know that many of the annotations and underlined passages in his Bible point in highly specific ways toward Shakespeare’s Bible allusions as documented in books by Richmond Noble, Naseeb Shaheen, and others.
But this still understates the weight and significance of the evidence in this book.
Not all Shakespeare’s bible allusions are equal. Some 81 of them account for as many as 20% of the total references to the Bible in Shakespeare, and many of these are marked in the de Vere Bible.
In fact, 49 of 81 Shakespeare “Bible Diagnostics” are found in the material record of de Vere’s writing, either in the Bible or – in three cases – in references in his surviving letters. As shown below (Figure two), these include thirty in the annotations of his Geneva Bible, three from his letters, and 16 more either through parallelism, adjacent location, or cross referencing (see dissertation).
Details forthcoming.
May 10, 2022 at 8:02 am
“Not all Shakespeare’s bible allusions are equal. Some 81 of them account for as many as 20% of the total references to the Bible in Shakespeare, and many of these are marked in the de Vere Bible.”
Please show your data for this claim.
May 10, 2022 at 1:23 pm
Please read my dissertation. I don’t know why anyone would write as much as you have written, and put himself forward as an expert, if he had not read the dissertation first. This is just vulgarity, something you specialize in. The basis for the statement is clearly established in appendix B.
On this website the evidence contained in that appendix will be supplied with photographic witness as time permits. Material on the Shakespeare diagnostics as a relevant category of analysis will be found here: https://shake-speares-bible.com/category/shakespeare-and-the-bible/shakespeare-diagnostics/. The category will be enlarged as more posts become available.
Mike Leadbetter, once you’ve actually read the relevant material in the dissertation (now in print and available to you for over twenty years, guy!), the topic can be discussed here, but if your purpose is to continue the hate campaign evident on your website and in your Facebook discussion group (all of which has been carefully documented for the record), then you will have to hold that conversation on some other website.
Is that distinction clear to you, Mike Leadbetter?