News and Scholarship on the Shakespeare Authorship Question

Tag Shakespeare Authorship Question

Dr. Nelson, I Presume: Will the Real Historian Please Stand Up?

Originally posted By Roger Stritmatter on April 22, 2013 In  a recent blog entry I cited some evidence for what appears to be a renewed campaign to make Professor Alan Nelson the face of scholarship when it comes to all… Continue Reading →

The Longevity of the Shakespeare Authorship Question: What Does it Mean?

Originally posted By Heward Wilkinson on October 31, 2011 We are pleased to offer another guest post from Dr. Heward Wilkinson. His previous post, on Professor Shapiro’s misunderstanding of the concept of “imagination,” may be found here. -Ed Our modern… Continue Reading →

William Ray Delivers the Mail – But Who is he, Really?

I have a confession to make. William Ray is my favorite mail carrier. On the days when my usual mailman is off, and William substitutes for him, we have the greatest seminars. I know, I know. Mr. Ray’s mail carrying… Continue Reading →

Fact Patterns in the Shakespeare Question: Edward De Vere’s Thousand Pound Annuity

From 1586 – two years before the Spanish Armada – to his death in 1604, Edward de Vere received a thousand pound annuity from the Elizabethan state. After the death of Elizabeth I in April, 1603, James I renewed the… Continue Reading →

Oxford’s Torment: Another Chapter in the Shakespeare Mystery

Greg Swann tours the zany world of hypocritical Shakespeare denialism and teaches us to marvel at the genius of Shakespeare.

De Vere Bible Psalms in Shakespeare: Surprise in Notes and Queries

The Blog reports on Richard Waugaman’s influential 2009 and 2010 Notes and Queries articles on the influence of the Sternhold and Hopkins edition of the Psalms in Shakespeare. Visual evidence from the de Vere Geneva Bible shows eight of the Psalms whose influence Waugaman discusses are marked with manicules in the de Vere copy of Sternhold and Hopkins.

Shakespeare’s Bible: St. Paul and the De Vere Geneva Bible

The post considers the significance of one of the most striking of the de Vere Bible annotations, the annotator’s supplemental correction of the missing pronoun at Romans 7:20.

The Critics and Anonymous

Posted By Roger Stritmatter on November 16, 2011 I’ve noticed something striking about the critical response to Anonymous. 

A Gratifying Amazon Review of Edward de Vere’s Geneva Bible

Sticky post

This Pretty Much Seals It – A Review of Edward de Vere’s Geneva Bible Mark Woodward 5.0 out of 5 stars Reviewed in the United States on September 25, 2017 Verified Purchaser If some literate but time-pressed friend were to… Continue Reading →

James Shapiro’s Follies: the Hunt for the “Notorious Hyphen”

Posted By Roger Stritmatter on April 18, 20, 2011 In case you were wondering if the internet is going to make us any smarter, the evidence is now in. The answer is, “no” – at least if one may draw… Continue Reading →

« Older posts

© 2024 Shake-speares-bible.com — Powered by WordPress

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑