Category History of Ideas
The blog entry contests the facile and mistaken argument that Edward de Vere is not the annotator of his own Bible, using photographic evidence of handwriting and underlining in two of the three major ink types in the Bible.
Why the colorful underlining of Ezekiel 16.49 was a game-changer in the Shakespeare Authorship question.
Posted By Roger Stritmatter on October 23, 2011 What will we find when we turn the telescope of modern speech act theory on Shakespeare’s plays? Keep reading and find out.
Posted By Roger Stritmatter on November 16, 2011 I’ve noticed something striking about the critical response to Anonymous.
The “Propaganda Model of News” and the Critical Response to Anonymous Guest Post by Michael Dudley November 20, 2011 Anonymous may be garnering praise for its meticulous CGI recreation of Elizabethan London, but few critics can bring themselves to laud… Continue Reading →
Posted By Roger Stritmatter on April 18, 20, 2011 In case you were wondering if the internet is going to make us any smarter, the evidence is now in. The answer is, “no” – at least if one may draw… Continue Reading →
De Vere Geneva Bible Online
Sticky post
Here’s a direct link to the Folger Library’s digitized copy of the de Vere Geneva Bible about which so much has been written in the New York Times and other international publications.
Leslie Howard’s fierce commitment to the Oxfordian cause is memorialized in his 1941 Pimpernel Smith.