Comments on: The Critics http://shake-speares-bible.com Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:07:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Roger Stritmatter http://shake-speares-bible.com/the-critics/comment-page-1/#comment-394 Roger Stritmatter Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:33:02 +0000 http://shake-speares-bible.com/?page_id=276#comment-394 Well Richard, to me the most shocking thing about that quotation is the venue in which it appeared. I'm sure that there are many others who share Kathman's cultivated ignorance on our topic but are shy about speaking up about it. Someone today just posted to my Facebook page a message that read "you're full of cr**," but when I tried to retrieve the message or even get some idea of the context (since I still have no idea of *what* exactly I was "full of cr**" about -- such is the erudition of some of our antagonists), it was already deleted, whether because the poster had some second doubts or it violated some Facebook terms of service, I don't know. In that particular issue of *The Oxfordian* Kathman has also allowed to refer to Charlton Ogburn's "typically mendacious" methodology. It was imho shameful to see such remarks endorsed in "*The Oxfordian,*" and to my knowledge there has never been any acknowledgment of the extent of the error. Well Richard, to me the most shocking thing about that quotation is the venue in which it appeared. I’m sure that there are many others who share Kathman’s cultivated ignorance on our topic but are shy about speaking up about it.

Someone today just posted to my Facebook page a message that read “you’re full of cr**,” but when I tried to retrieve the message or even get some idea of the context (since I still have no idea of *what* exactly I was “full of cr**” about — such is the erudition of some of our antagonists), it was already deleted, whether because the poster had some second doubts or it violated some Facebook terms of service, I don’t know.

In that particular issue of *The Oxfordian* Kathman has also allowed to refer to Charlton Ogburn’s “typically mendacious” methodology. It was imho shameful to see such remarks endorsed in “*The Oxfordian,*” and to my knowledge there has never been any acknowledgment of the extent of the error.

]]> By: richard waugaman http://shake-speares-bible.com/the-critics/comment-page-1/#comment-393 richard waugaman Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:19:39 +0000 http://shake-speares-bible.com/?page_id=276#comment-393 Kathman seems to be the lone voice crying in the wilderness. No-- make that weeping, and gnashing his teeth. Is it just possible that Kathman has some axe to grind? Kathman seems to be the lone voice crying in the wilderness. No– make that weeping, and gnashing his teeth. Is it just possible that Kathman has some axe to grind?

]]>