<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>shake-speares-bible.com</title>
	<link>http://shake-speares-bible.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:14:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.2.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>Greetings</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to Shake-Speare&#8217;s Bible.com. Our topic is Shake-speare&#8217;s Bible. The one he owned. Really. No joke. To learn what that means, please visit the &#8220;about&#8221; page.]]></description>
		<link>http://shake-speares-bible.com/2009/11/29/greetings/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Roger that, CEDAR</title>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Well, its been a few weeks since I&#8217;ve done a post, and I can only plead in my own defense for such lack of productivity that I have in fact been very productive indeed, just not on Facebook or on this blog  (Hey, we old fuddy-duddy scholars have to do real work sometimes&#8230;..with such [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://shake-speares-bible.com/2012/02/01/roger-that-cedar/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>O-Philia</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Guest post by Leda Zakarison* I&#8217;m one of those people who should love Shakespeare. I fit the bill perfectly for a teenage Shakespeare fanatic – I read books, speak French, and participate in class discussions. I&#8217;ve always bought into this notion, too. I liked the idea of sitting in a corner of the library, sipping [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://shake-speares-bible.com/2011/12/06/o-philia-2/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Help Wanted: Harper Publishers Seeks Fact Checkers. Will Hire Immediately</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The Montreal Gazette needs to hire some fact checkers. Or maybe it&#8217;s Harper publishers, one of the largest book manufacturers  in the world. You tell me who screwed up worse here.  It certainly wasn&#8217;t Michael York. This new missive by MG staffer Pat Donnelly, suggests that the &#8220;Anonymous writer should put a bag over his head.&#8221;  Donnelley [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://shake-speares-bible.com/2011/11/22/wuds-up-with-the-montreal-gazette/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Michael York to Professor Stanley Wells and Paul Edmondson: Have You No Sense of Decency, Sirs?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Shakespearean actor Michael York to Wells &#038; Edmondson:  “Have you no sense of decency sirs, at long last? Or, as Shakespeare put it in Hamlet, 'O shame! where is thy blush?’”]]></description>
		<link>http://shake-speares-bible.com/2011/11/21/michael-york-to-professor-stanley-wells-and-paul-edmondson-have-you-no-sense-of-decency-sirs/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The “Propaganda Model of News” and the Critical Response to Anonymous</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Guest Post by Michael Dudley* Anonymous may be garnering praise for its meticulous CGI recreation of Elizabethan London, but few critics can bring themselves to laud it as a film. As was noted in Roger&#8217;s earlier post, many film critics – the bulk of whom are surely not Shakespearean scholars themselves – apparently feel compelled to [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://shake-speares-bible.com/2011/11/20/the-%e2%80%9cpropaganda-model-of-news%e2%80%9d-and-the-critical-response-to-anonymous/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Stratfordians fighting on two fronts now the Vatican weighs in</title>
		<description><![CDATA[My blog post about the Vatican&#8217;s coming out for the Catholic Bard thesis and Peter Dickson&#8217;s flamboyant response is now available. Dickson comments: “Given the report concerning the bombshell announcement and apparent claim by the Vatican’s official newspaper (L’Osservatore Romano), anti-Stratfordians and Oxfordians can never say I did not warn them since 1998 of the importance of the [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://shake-speares-bible.com/2011/11/20/stratfordians-fighting-on-two-fronts-now-the-vatican-weighs-in/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>&#8220;R[eliable] S[ource]&#8221; and &#8220;Fringe Theory&#8221; Authorship Question &#8211; Some Comments and (Below) a Guest Post by Richard Whalen&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Many readers will already have heard something about the authorship wiki-wars. One of the fictions effectively perpetrated on unwitting newbies in these edit battles by the usual gang of diehard orthodoxists is that anything dealing in an intelligent way with the authorship question does not constitute a &#8220;reliable source&#8221; (is not RS) &#8212; apparently because [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://shake-speares-bible.com/2011/11/19/richard-whalen-on-reliable-source-and-fringe-theory-authorship-question/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Freedom of Inquiry Alive and Well at WSU</title>
		<description><![CDATA[ Dr. Michael Delahoyde and his student Leda Zakarias at Washington State University in Pullman, WN, speak out on the authorship question on local news.]]></description>
		<link>http://shake-speares-bible.com/2011/11/18/freedom-of-inquiry-alive-and-well-at-wsu/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Can You Pass Today&#8217;s Quiz?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Understanding Shakespeare&#8217;s Bible allusions is not a spectator sport. Test your ability against the experts. Can you pass the Shakespeare Bible  Allusion Quiz? It doesn&#8217;t bite, promise&#8230;.and will not affect your semester grade unless, of course you pass&#8230;.:) More on the de Vere Bible annotations.]]></description>
		<link>http://shake-speares-bible.com/2011/11/17/can-you-pass-todays-quiz/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

