Comments on: Bible FAQ http://shake-speares-bible.com Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:07:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Book That Would Be Awesome If It Would Be Written | knitwitted http://shake-speares-bible.com/bible-faq/comment-page-1/#comment-437 Book That Would Be Awesome If It Would Be Written | knitwitted Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:43:29 +0000 http://shake-speares-bible.com/?page_id=216#comment-437 [...] to Dr. Stritmatter for being ahead of his time and an expert in the beginnings of a little-but-yet-to-be explored [...] [...] to Dr. Stritmatter for being ahead of his time and an expert in the beginnings of a little-but-yet-to-be explored [...]

]]> By: Roger Stritmatter http://shake-speares-bible.com/bible-faq/comment-page-1/#comment-259 Roger Stritmatter Thu, 03 Nov 2011 12:11:09 +0000 http://shake-speares-bible.com/?page_id=216#comment-259 Good morning, Bella. I wouldn't say that it is impossible that a Catholic would have owned a Geneva Bible, but I would also say: 1) The authorship question has, in my opinion, long since passed beyond such hypotheticals; 2) We're now looking at a particular Geneva Bible, once owned and annotated by the 17th Earl of Oxford 3) It shows many tangible and telling connections to the works of Shakespeare 4) These connections are part of a much larger pattern of connective tissue that has been developed over the last ninety years suggesting that Oxford is the real author of the canon. Therefore, discussions about who might possibly have owned what kinds of Bible, while they may be entertaining in their own right, have little relevance to the actual fact pattern that the Oxfordians have brought forward for consideration. For further details, please consult Looney online, or find a copy of Anderson, Ogburn, etc. Thanks for the question! Good morning, Bella. I wouldn’t say that it is impossible that a Catholic would have owned a Geneva Bible, but I would also say:

1) The authorship question has, in my opinion, long since passed beyond such hypotheticals;
2) We’re now looking at a particular Geneva Bible, once owned and annotated by the 17th Earl of Oxford
3) It shows many tangible and telling connections to the works of Shakespeare
4) These connections are part of a much larger pattern of connective tissue that has been developed over the last ninety years suggesting that Oxford is the real author of the canon.

Therefore, discussions about who might possibly have owned what kinds of Bible, while they may be entertaining in their own right, have little relevance to the actual fact pattern that the Oxfordians have brought forward for consideration. For further details, please consult Looney online, or find a copy of Anderson, Ogburn, etc.

Thanks for the question!

]]> By: bella http://shake-speares-bible.com/bible-faq/comment-page-1/#comment-257 bella Thu, 03 Nov 2011 02:45:57 +0000 http://shake-speares-bible.com/?page_id=216#comment-257 It was my understanding that when Queen Elizabeth, all ( if not most variables) og the good book were allowed. So one could argue that Shakespeare (although catholic), may in fact owned a Geneva bible..what say you? It was my understanding that when Queen Elizabeth, all ( if not most variables) og the good book were allowed. So one could argue that Shakespeare (although catholic), may in fact owned a Geneva bible..what say you?

]]>